<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Kommentare zu: Getestet: EX3 als VJ-Cam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.videojournalismus.net/2008/10/02/getestet-ex3-als-vj-cam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.videojournalismus.net/2008/10/02/getestet-ex3-als-vj-cam/</link>
	<description>Das Weblog zum Thema</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 17:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Von: Bodo W</title>
		<link>http://www.videojournalismus.net/2008/10/02/getestet-ex3-als-vj-cam/#comment-9493</link>
		<dc:creator>Bodo W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 12:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videojournalismus.net/2008/10/02/getestet-ex3-als-vj-cam/#comment-9493</guid>
		<description>... das erklärt auch den Preisunterschied zur kleinen Panasonic, di ehat 1/3 Zoll Chips....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; das erklärt auch den Preisunterschied zur kleinen Panasonic, di ehat 1/3 Zoll Chips&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

